Damages In Dog Bite Cases Considered By Injury Lawyer In Mississauga

According to the new rule in dog bite cases the 'one bite rule' may not be applicable anymore. There are few exceptions however in the new rule. According to this exception any person trying to commit a crime and the dog bites will not make the owner liable for damages. However, in such cases it is required to prove that the owner of the dog is not liable unless it was not unreasonable to keep such a dog on the premises for the purpose of the protection of the property of the owner. With all these complicacies, it is required to hire an Injury Lawyer in Mississauga to get the right damages.

The damages claimed

When it comes to awarding damages in a dog bite case,the laws of the states play a very important role. It is highly likely that the damages are increased or reduced depending on the degree of contribution of the owner to the action and behavior of the dog. For example, the Injury Lawyer in Mississauga will consider whether the dog owner was negligent in holding back the dog or ignored the fact that the dog has a tendency to bite people. If so he or she will be held liable to pay more damages as compared to the owner who did not contribute to such actions of the dog.

Negligence of the victim

The negligence of the owner of the dog is an important factor that will determine the amount of damages to be paid to the injured victims. It is important for the Injury Lawyer in Mississauga to make sure that the judge the fault of the owner of the dog into account while calculating the damages. In case the accident is caused due to some provocation of the dog by the owner in part, it will also be considered as a negligence of the victim. In such cases the judge will reduce the claim amount by the amount to which the victim is reckoned to be at fault.

Someone else involved

In a few cases of dog bite cases, it is found by the Injury Lawyer in Mississauga that the incident is caused due to the involvement of someone other than the owner of then dog or the victim, for example, a person whose duty was to watch the dog but failed to do so. In such situations, the owner will be still liable to pay the damages for the injuries caused. However, the owner of the dog can ask the other person to compensate him or her according to the degree of their involvement in the incident.

The remedies ordered